ACCA LW Eng Syllabus B. The Law Of Obligations - Explain The Control Over Terms - Notes 3 / 3
Exclusion Clauses
These exempt or restrict the liability 1 party from a breach of contract
As this seems unfair - the courts don't like them
So therefore for one to be allowed it has to pass 3 tests:
Incorporated Correctly?
Constructed Properly?
Reasonable?(B2B contracts)
Fair? (B2C contracts)
Let's look at these in detail..
Incorporated Correctly?
This basically means BEFORE any agreement is made
NB. If something is signed (even though not read) - it is presumed you've read it
So a notice board with an exclusion clause has to be there at the time of the agreement
The case for this is Olley v Marlborough Court Hotels
If a ticket has an exclusion clause on the other side of it - then the ticket has to be shown before agreement
The case for this is Chappelton v Barry
Verbal statements override any written exclusion clauses
The case for this is Curtis v Chemical Cleaning
Constructed Properly
This means clearly worded
Ambiguity in wording will go against the person relying on the exclusion clause
This is called the Contra Proferentum Rule
The case for this is Houghton v Trafalgar Insurance
Reasonable? - Business to Business Contracts
This is from UCTA 77
Exclusion clauses on death and personal injury are always ignored by courts
To see if other exclusion clauses are reasonable - courts look at:
Relative Bargaining Strengths of the 2 businesses
Any inducements (eg discounts) to allow for an exclusion clause
Did both parties know about the clause?
Are the goods bespoke?
Fair? - Business to Consumer contracts
This is from CRA 2015
Exclusion clauses on death and legal rights are always ignored by courts
To see if other exclusion clauses are fair - courts look at:
Significant differences in each others' obligations?
Prominent and simply worded clause?
Any disproportionate compensation to be paid?
Opportunity for the consumer to read the clause?
Can the business unilaterally change the terms and price?