CIMA BA2 Syllabus B. COSTING - Allocation and Apportionment - Notes 1 / 9
Allocation and Apportionment
Cost Card | |
---|---|
Direct Materials | These specifically go into making the product |
Direct Labour | |
Direct Expenses | |
Prime cost | The total of Direct costs |
Production Overheads (e.g. Factory Electricity and Rent) | These must be allocated, apportioned and absorbed |
Total Production Cost | |
Absorption Costing
Basically absorbs the fixed production overheads into the product cost
Absorption costing involves 3 stages:
Allocation and Apportionment of overheads
Reapportionment of service (non-production) cost centre overheads to production cost centres
Absorption of Overheads (after allocation and apportionment)
Stage 1: Allocation and apportionment of overheads
Allocation means charging overheads directly to specific departments
Eg. Supervisor salary of the packaging department will be entirely allocated to the packaging department
Apportionment
If the overheads relate to more than one department, then they must be apportioned / shared between these departments using a fair basis.
Eg. Factory rent apportioned between all departments that use the factory (using a suitable basis of apportionment)
Possible bases of apportionment include:
Floor Area
for overheads such as rent, rates, heat and light overheads
Cost or NBV of non-current assets
for overheads such as depreciation and insurance
Number of Employees
for overheads such as canteen costs; personnel office, welfare, wages, first aid
Illustration
Which basis should factory rent be apportioned on?
a) Area
b) Number of employees
Solution
Area
Let us go further and try this with numbers
Rental cost $600
There are 2 factories in the department:
Factory 1 occupies 100m² of space
Factory 2 occupies 200m² of spaceHow much of the rental cost should be apportioned to Factory 1 and Factory 2?
Solution
Factory 1 = $600 x 100²/300² = $200
Factory 2 $600 x 200²/300² = $400
Illustration - Apportionment and Allocation
General overhead | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ | |||||
Rent | 100,000 | ||||
Machinery Insurance | 40,000 | ||||
Stores wages | 20,000 | ||||
Heating costs | 60,000 | ||||
Total | 220,000 | ||||
Mixing Department | Storing Department | Stores Department | Canteen | Total | |
Floor Space | 10,000 | 3,000 | 1,000 | 6,000 | 20,000 |
Machinery NBV | 2,000 | 1,000 | 600 | 400 | 4,000 |
Rent apportionment | =10,000/20,000 x 100,000 = 50,000 | 15,000 | 5,000 | 30,000 | 100,000 |
Machine insurance apportionment | =2,000/4,000 x 40,000 = 20,000 | 10,000 | 6,000 | 4,000 | 40,000 |
Stores wages - allocation | 60,000 | 20,000 | |||
Heating cost apportionment | =10,000/20,000 x 60,000 = 30,000 | 9,000 | 3,000 | 18,000 | 60,000 |
Total for each department | 100,000 | 34,000 | 34,000 | 52,000 | |
Stage 2: Reapportionment of service cost centre overheads to production cost centres
Since service cost centres/departments are not directly involved in making the products, the fixed production overheads of these service cost centres must be shared out between the production departments.
Examples of service cost centres include: stores, canteen, maintenance and payroll departments.
Illustration
A factory consists of 2 production centres ( A and B ) and one service centre ( C )
The overheads of each centre are:
A $71,000
B $69,000
C $42,000
The overheads of the service centre are re-apportioned to the production centres on the basis of number of employees.
Number of employees:
A - 40
B - 32
C - 17
What is the total overhead for production centre A?
Solution
40/(40+32) x $42,000+$71,000= $94,333
Note that when apportioning the overheads on the basis of employees, we did not add the service centre employees, this is because we want all of the overheads apportioned between the production centres.
Now that all of the overheads are correctly allocated and apportioned into the production departments, they can be absorbed into the cost of a product being produced.